<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism Refuted&#8230;Easily (Part 2- Atheism&#8217;s Bias)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/</link>
	<description>knowledge. wisdom. virtue.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-381</guid>
		<description>I have read Wald&#039;s quote before in various places. however, I have not been able to certify it. Some say he worte in a treatise called &quot;The Origin of Life&quot;. I wish I could verify this information since I have claimed in several ocasions that he quoted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read Wald&#8217;s quote before in various places. however, I have not been able to certify it. Some say he worte in a treatise called &#8220;The Origin of Life&#8221;. I wish I could verify this information since I have claimed in several ocasions that he quoted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highdesert</title>
		<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>highdesert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 01:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-352</guid>
		<description>The Wald quote is falsified. Those were not his actual words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wald quote is falsified. Those were not his actual words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexM</title>
		<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you down the road!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randwagner</title>
		<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>randwagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Mr. Ubiquitous, Your comment seems to reflect a misunderstanding of my post- and it seemsa bit abrasive. You are apparently calling me out on putting forth a false dichotomy. However, the quote you quote was from an atheist that won the Nobel Peace prize in biology in 1971. I did not make a dichotomy- he did.  But my point in including it in my post was not to discuss the options of how life came to be, but to show his obvious and admitted bias toward the philosphy of naturalism and against belief in God. I&#039;m not sure when he wrote the quote, but it is sort of irrelevant since I was not making a case for or against spontaneous genertion or creation. Your words, &quot;Way to be current&quot; sounds condescending. Am I misinterpreting your tone?

peace to you, friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ubiquitous, Your comment seems to reflect a misunderstanding of my post- and it seemsa bit abrasive. You are apparently calling me out on putting forth a false dichotomy. However, the quote you quote was from an atheist that won the Nobel Peace prize in biology in 1971. I did not make a dichotomy- he did.  But my point in including it in my post was not to discuss the options of how life came to be, but to show his obvious and admitted bias toward the philosphy of naturalism and against belief in God. I&#8217;m not sure when he wrote the quote, but it is sort of irrelevant since I was not making a case for or against spontaneous genertion or creation. Your words, &#8220;Way to be current&#8221; sounds condescending. Am I misinterpreting your tone?</p>
<p>peace to you, friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubiquitous Che</title>
		<link>http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/2008/07/18/atheism-refutedeasily-part-2-atheisms-bias/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubiquitous Che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtlife.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I call shenanigans on your false dichotomy:
&lt;blockquote&gt;When it comes to the origin of life, we have only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a&gt;Abiogenesis does not mean the same thing as spontaneous generation&lt;/a&gt;.

As cdk007 says in his video: Spontaneous generation has been disproved three times. No scientist has ever claimed it in over two hundred years.

Way to be current.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call shenanigans on your false dichotomy:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to the origin of life, we have only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God.</p></blockquote>
<p><a>Abiogenesis does not mean the same thing as spontaneous generation</a>.</p>
<p>As cdk007 says in his video: Spontaneous generation has been disproved three times. No scientist has ever claimed it in over two hundred years.</p>
<p>Way to be current.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
